A101

A101 + TSP60 or E200 + TSP60 for a Phone-and-Camera Survey?

A hand carrying a FlashFish E200 with a European AC socket outdoors

Choose A101 + TSP60 when its verified device paths and lower component weight meet your survey plan; consider E200 + TSP60 when its additional nominal energy is useful and its different outputs fit the equipment. Neither is automatically the better phone-and-camera kit. First write down the exact phone, camera battery, charging accessory and cable you intend to carry.

This comparison concerns the two current Europe kit listings, not a station-only substitute. Both exact kit configurations were available to order with inventory when checked on 6 November 2026. Availability is a snapshot, not a reservation.

Compare the actual station and panel paths

Question A101 + TSP60 E200 + TSP60
Station nominal capacity 97.68Wh 151Wh
Station AC continuous / peak 120W / 240W 200W / 400W
Station AC waveform Not provided in the authoritative record Modified sine wave
Relevant station solar/DC ceiling 40W; 12–26V input 40W; 11–24V solar/DC input
Station USB paths Two USB-C PD ports listed up to 18W each; two USB-A QC 3.0 ports listed up to 18W each Two USB-A QC 3.0 ports listed up to 18W each; one USB-A 5V/2.4A port listed up to 12W
Station net weight 1.2kg About 1.85kg
Station + 1.9kg panel component sum 3.10kg; excludes bag and accessories 3.75kg; excludes bag and accessories
Germany EUR product price, 6 November 2026 €142.98; exact A101+TSP60 variant €159.99; exact E200+TSP60 variant

The station facts come from the exact-model manual-derived records; the current A101 kit listing and E200 kit listing establish the offered configurations. Germany contextual prices were checked for the exact variants. Delivery charges, country-specific checkout treatment and promotions are not included in a delivered-price calculation.

Check the exact A101 + TSP60 kit configuration after completing the device-path checks below.

List three paths before choosing

  • Phone: record the accepted charging input, protocol and the exact cable. A101 USB-C availability may simplify the path, but an 18W port does not promise a particular phone charging speed.
  • Camera: distinguish in-camera USB charging from a separate battery charger. For an AC charger, confirm its input label and manufacturer acceptance of the supply waveform; do not replace continuous power with a peak figure.
  • Panel: identify the TSP60 label as TSP18V60W and check its supplied cable and station input instructions. Direct panel-to-device charging is a different path from panel-to-station-to-device charging.

The TSP60 panel page and TSP18V60W manufacturer manual provide a starting point for exact component checks. The panel has its own output options. Do not transfer its USB-C rating to E200, or assume that all listed outputs can provide their maximum simultaneously. Confirm the actual connector, polarity and supplied kit cable before connection.

Three survey decisions

Declared situation Useful conclusion What could change it
Phone and camera both have verified charging paths, and carrying less is the main constraint A101 is the lighter station; the station-plus-panel component sum is 0.65kg lower The full packed weight, required energy and successful exact-device charging checks are still needed.
The energy plan exceeds what the smaller nominal capacity can support, but all E200 device paths are confirmed E200 offers 53.32Wh more nominal capacity for €17.01 more in the dated Germany snapshot Usable delivered energy and conversion losses were not measured; the extra nominal energy is not a runtime promise.
The camera charger needs a known AC waveform, but acceptance is unresolved Defer either purchase for that charger until the evidence is complete E200 is modified sine and A101 waveform is unknown; the lower price or higher AC rating does not resolve the gap.

Plan the day without assigning a solar yield

Write a starting charge, the intended survey tasks and a separate fallback for phone contact and unsaved survey data. Nominal Wh is not the energy delivered at a device after losses. Do not assign a charge count or operating duration without the actual load, accepted charging path and measured or defensible usable-energy assumptions.

For European route planning, JRC PVGIS helps explain why solar potential is location- and season-dependent. No PVGIS simulation or field measurement was performed here. A panel rating does not establish what a shaded stop on a November survey will collect, and neither kit promises a complete solar refill during the workday.

Frequently asked questions

Does a 60W panel give either station 60W of charging input?

No. The panel rating and station input ceiling are separate. Both station records list a 40W maximum for the relevant solar/DC input; actual input and daily energy are not fixed by that ceiling.

Can I use USB-C directly from both stations?

A101 lists USB-C PD outputs up to 18W. E200 lists USB-A outputs, not a station USB-C output. Check the exact device input, protocol and cable rather than judging by connector shape.

Does the larger E200 AC rating approve my camera charger?

No. Its documented waveform is modified sine. Obtain charger-manufacturer acceptance of the exact supply, voltage and frequency; wattage alone cannot settle compatibility. A101 waveform is not provided in the product record.

Do the quoted weights include everything I will carry?

No. The component sums cover one station and one panel only. Add the actual bag, cables, adapters, camera, batteries, phone and any independent reserve, then weigh the packed kit.

Are the Germany prices a final delivery quote?

No. They are dated EUR contextual product prices checked on 6 November 2026. Confirm country, exact variant, tax treatment, delivery and any discount at checkout; no delivered total was obtained.

Choose after the missing checks are closed

Check the exact E200 + TSP60 kit configuration if its energy and confirmed device paths fit your complete carry plan. If either charger or kit cable remains uncertain, ask Europe support for the exact component information before ordering.

Method: source-based comparison of exact-model records, fresh Europe kit inventory and Germany contextual EUR prices on 6 November 2026. Weight sums and price/nominal-energy differences are arithmetic, not measured packed-kit results. No survey, charger pairing, panel yield or runtime was tested.

En lire plus

Illustration of SR5000 beside an exterior wall below a rooftop solar array
Illustration of SR5000 beside an exterior wall below a rooftop solar array

Laisser un commentaire

Ce site est protégé par hCaptcha, et la Politique de confidentialité et les Conditions de service de hCaptcha s’appliquent.